Updated on April 26, 2010

Home  |  About Us  |  Member's RV's  |  Ontario RV's  |  Forum  Schedule Tools & Tips  For Sale  Links  Contact Us

 

Have you ever wondered how the 406 system differs from 121.5 system? Go to the NOAA  website and click on the "Satellite" link. 

 


COMPARISON OF THE 406 MHz AND 121.5 MHz DISTRESS BEACONS

The following table compares 406 MHz and 121.5 MHz beacons in these critical areas:

406 MHz Beacons

121.5 MHz Beacons

Coverage:

o Global

 

o Ground station dependent; ground stations have an effective radius of about 1800 nm (2300 km). Both ground station and beacon must be in satellite footprint. Current coverage is about two-thirds of the world.

False Alerts:

o All alerts come from beacons. Satellite beacon transmissions are digital, coded signals. Satellites process only encoded data, other signals are rejected. 

o About 1 in 12 alerts are actual distress.

o Beacon-unique coding/registration allow rapid incident corroboration. Registration mandatory since 1994. 90% beacons registered. About 70% of false alerts are resolved by a phone or radio call to registration POCs prior to launching SAR assets.



o Only about 1 in 5 alerts come from beacons. Satellites cannot discern beacon signals from many non-beacon sources. Beacons transmit anonymously with no unique identifier. Non-beacon interferers have included ATM machines, pizza ovens, and stadium scoreboards!

o Fewer than 2 in 1000 alerts and 2 in 100 composite alerts are actual distress.

o Since 121.5 MHz beacons transmit anonymously, the only way to ascertain the situation is to dispatch resources to investigate -- a costly disadvantage.

 

Alerting:

o First alert warrants launch of SAR assets. Earlier launches puts assets on scene sooner--Average 3 hrs saved in maritime, 6 hrs in inland.

o Average initial detection/alerting by orbiting satellites is about 45 minutes.

o Average subsequent satellite passes every 60 minutes.

o Vessel/aircraft ID, point of contact information provided with alerts allows rapid verification or stand-down.

o Allows false alert follow -up to continuously improve system integrity/reliability.

o Near instantaneous detection by geostationary satellites. System provides world-wide coverage.

 



o High false alert rate makes first-alert launch unfeasible.

Absent independent distress information means RCCs must wait for additional alert information.

o Same as 406 MHz.

o Same as 406 MHz.

o Alerts are anonymous. 121.5 MHz analog technology not capable of transmitting data.

o No false alert follow -up capability.

o No GEO detection capability = no instantaneous detection.

 

Position Information:

o 1-3 nm (2-5 km) accuracy on average. Position calculated by Doppler shift analysis.

o Less than 100 yard accuracy with GPS-equipped beacons. GPS position processed with initial alert. Major beacon enhancement.


o 12-15 nm (15-25 km) accuracy on average. Position calculated by Doppler shift analysis.

o No GPS capability.

 

Locating the Target:

o Superior alert (non-GPS) position accuracy limits initial search area to about 25 sq. nm (65 sq. km).

o GPS-equipped beacons reduce search area to a significantly smaller area.

o 121.5 MHz homing signal facilitates target location by radio detection finder equipped search units.

 

o Initial position uncertainty result in 500 sq. nm

(800 sq. km) search area on average.

o No GPS capability.

o Same as 406 MHz.

 

Power Output:

o 5.0 Watts (Strong power output)

 

o 0.1 Watt (Weaker power output) – Hard for satellites to detect

Cost:

o Average cost is $1000 (GPS-equipped EPIRB)

o Average cost is $500 (Personal Locator Beacon)

o Average cost is $1500.00 - $3000.00 (ELT

 

o Average cost is $200.00 - $400.00 (EPIRB)

o Average cost is $600.00 - $1200.00 (ELT)

o 121.5 MHz beacons are being phased out

Have you ever wondered how the 406 system differs from 121.5 system? Check out this link to the NOAA website